🔗 Share this article

Over the weekend, the game developers launched a fresh playlist titled Relaxed Breakthrough. In essence, this mode mirrors the standard Breakthrough format but includes several key changes:

• Every squad has just eight human participants, with the rest filled by 32 bots.
• Activities performed by real players award complete experience points, while AI activities provide lower rewards.
• Just a pair of maps can be played: Siege of Cairo and Empire State map.
• Features like Player tags, accolades, and stat tracking have been turned off.

So essentially, the playlist lives up to its title: it offers a laid-back version of Breakthrough. At face value, you might think there's nothing wrong, as it gives more options for gamers seeking alternative methods to have fun with the title. However, gaming history have taught us anything, it's that not everyone will be happy. In other words, a lot of BF6 players are mad.

Community Reactions: Anger to Praise

"People want real players. Avoid making the errors of your competitors," states one reply to the mode reveal. "Absolutely shocking concept," comments another. At the same time, in community forums, one user remarks, "It's unclear where we are headed with this game," and someone else details everything they consider to be broken in Battlefield 6: "Resolve glitches, address drone issues, correct rocket mechanics, adjust aiming after sprinting, fix awful hit registration. We do not require this AI-heavy playlist."

On the other hand, for every complaint, there are players sharing how much they're liking the recent addition. "It's enjoyable to warm up, human participants keep it from being a total farmfest but it's quite laid-back," reads a forum post. "The community fails to see that there are players who have lives and don't play this title 24/7. Allow them to find a middle ground," states a different comment. A response on Twitter clarifies that as they're "a battledad with busy schedules, this is great for me," and someone else praises the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Constructive Concerns and Player Feedback

All that said, players have valid points to criticize Casual Breakthrough. A few folks have highlighted that it could increase queue times even longer for other modes due to the large amount of playlists in the game already. Similarly, certain regions often face mostly bots in the existing playlists. Additionally, it appears a little backwards that the mode won't start without a minimum number of human gamers, despite it focuses mostly on combat against bots.

Lastly, one of the biggest complaints is that a previous feature was meant to offer full XP, including AI matches, but that got canned when they tried to eliminate XP farming from the mode. Thus Casual Breakthrough seems like the community meeting them in the middle, as per forum feedback. A different user labels this addition as the developers "dropping the ball significantly, I experienced great enjoyment in the initial release, what prompted them to adjust it?"

Future Prospects: Adjustments Occur?

Should the development team has demonstrated something so far with the latest installment, it is that they're listening and responding to player input. Assignments that were overly hard were adjusted rapidly, as did the required Redsec challenges. Chances are that, if their data shows this recent mode isn't performing to their expectations, they will not hesitate to make further modifications.